The next two days of class were spent watching a movie regarding water wars that are shaping our environment, foreign and domestic. While many of the points brought up were alarming and very interesting, there were many aspects of how they went about their arguments that I disliked and found to be unprofessional. When depicting courtroom trials between the individuals and the companies, they made their own "courtroom artist" representations of the people and had all of the company's people look big, mean, and scary. That's a cute little tactic but it just looks unprofessional. Also, when the guy went to Nestle's seminar about some of their water projects and expected an answer right away about the letter he received how would those individuals talking about the projects have any idea about that situation? It makes sense to try to talk about that at the end of the presentation when they can find out more about the situation, as the suggested. I'm not saying that Nestle as a company wasn't doing anything wrong, there is just no way to expect those presenters who were likely engineers and other technical employees to have any idea about that situation immediately. And the crowd didn't sound outraged as they suggested.
I understand with a film like this where you have strong feelings about something, some points or arguments may be a little biased, and sometimes this is necessary to get across a point. But using unprofessional tactics and typical "political moves" leads me to disregard their arguments and thoughts.
No comments:
Post a Comment